tsunamoro
12-26-2007, 03:35 PM
Again me!
In determining the mask depending on the number of hosts, the criteria is to chose the mask which "generate" enough space. For example, a 192 (/26) mask creates enough space for 62 hosts.
That's clear.
Let's consider now the net in Figure 3.6 (page 142).
Network B has 30 hosts, or we have to create space for 30 host.
If we chose a /27 mask as suggested in the example, we have space for 30 hosts, but we can't assign the address to the router interface.
So I suppose it's better (we have) to choose the /26 mask.
I know that those are examples and we have to catch the idea behind the VLSMs design, but I thought it's worth remarking what I said.
Am I wrong?
In determining the mask depending on the number of hosts, the criteria is to chose the mask which "generate" enough space. For example, a 192 (/26) mask creates enough space for 62 hosts.
That's clear.
Let's consider now the net in Figure 3.6 (page 142).
Network B has 30 hosts, or we have to create space for 30 host.
If we chose a /27 mask as suggested in the example, we have space for 30 hosts, but we can't assign the address to the router interface.
So I suppose it's better (we have) to choose the /26 mask.
I know that those are examples and we have to catch the idea behind the VLSMs design, but I thought it's worth remarking what I said.
Am I wrong?