<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Lammle Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/</link>
		<description>Cisco and Microsoft Certification Objectives, Work Related Issues, and New Technologies</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:40:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>CCNA Data Center Certification</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6221&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:11:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>What approach should be taken by people new to the field for this certification?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>What approach should be taken by people new to the field for this certification?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=63">Announcements</category>
			<dc:creator>aguadonj</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6221</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Icmp vs snmp?</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6220&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:19:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>ICMP VS SNMP?  What are the differences...to me they resemble similar roles. 
ARP/RARP VS DNS/DHCP  What are the differences...to me they resemble...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>ICMP VS SNMP?  What are the differences...to me they resemble similar roles.<br />
ARP/RARP VS DNS/DHCP  What are the differences...to me they resemble similar roles.<br />
<br />
Thanks<br />
Justin217</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=66">Network +</category>
			<dc:creator>justin217</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6220</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Exam Track</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6219&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 09:23:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Looking for some advice on what track to track. 
 
I understand the new Cisco exams are now available to sit, but I've been studying currently for...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Looking for some advice on what track to track.<br />
<br />
I understand the new Cisco exams are now available to sit, but I've been studying currently for the 640-802. Im looking to progress through my CCNA Security and CCNP Security eventually but I'm not entirely sure which exam's I should pursure.<br />
<br />
Am i better off starting with the new 100-101 ICND1 then going straight onto 640-554 IINS to achieve my CCNA Security or should I continue revising and sit the 640-822 ICND1, them the 640-816 ICND2 to achieve my CCNA, from there taking the 640-554 IINS to get my CCNA Security, or can I do my 640-822 ICND1 then go straight onto the 640-554 IINS and achieve the CCNA Security?<br />
<br />
Im rather confused still upon how the new Cisco qualifications tie in with the old. :confused:<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance to responses</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=80">General Questions (Any Chapter)</category>
			<dc:creator>jgraham95</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6219</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Area BACKBONE(0) (Inactive)</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6218&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 20:35:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Working through the OSPF configuration on p. 463-465 on my three routers.  My Corp and R1 routers are exchanging OSPF routes just fine, but my R3 is...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Working through the OSPF configuration on p. 463-465 on my three routers.  My Corp and R1 routers are exchanging OSPF routes just fine, but my R3 is not.  <br />
<br />
Here are clips from show run and show ip route outputs:<br />
Corp<br />
----<br />
router ospf 132<br />
 log-adjacency-changes<br />
 network 10.1.2.1 0.0.0.0 area 0<br />
 network 10.2.4.1 0.0.0.0 area 0<br />
 network 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0<br />
<br />
S    192.168.30.0/24 [150/0] via 10.1.4.2<br />
O    192.168.10.0/24 [110/65] via 10.1.2.2, 00:45:45, Serial0/0<br />
     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets<br />
C       10.1.2.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0<br />
C       10.1.4.0 is directly connected, Serial0/1<br />
C    192.168.0.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0<br />
<br />
<br />
R1<br />
--<br />
router ospf 1<br />
 log-adjacency-changes<br />
 network 10.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0<br />
 network 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0<br />
<br />
S    192.168.30.0/24 [150/0] via 10.1.2.1<br />
C    192.168.10.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0<br />
     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets<br />
C       10.1.2.0 is directly connected, Serial0/1<br />
O    192.168.0.0/24 [110/65] via 10.1.2.1, 00:47:07, Serial0/1<br />
<br />
R2<br />
--<br />
router ospf 45678<br />
 log-adjacency-changes<br />
 network 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0<br />
 network 192.168.30.1 0.0.0.0 area 0<br />
<br />
C    192.168.30.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0<br />
     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets<br />
C       10.1.4.0 is directly connected, Serial0/1<br />
<br />
R2#sh ip ospf<br />
 Routing Process &quot;ospf 45678&quot; with ID 192.168.30.1<br />
...<br />
    Area BACKBONE(0) (Inactive)<br />
        Number of interfaces in this area is 2<br />
<br />
R2's show run and show ip ospf indicates that OSPF is running, but the show ip ospf also shows the area 0 as inactive.<br />
<br />
Any ideas for getting OSPF working on R2?<br />
<br />
Thanks.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=55">Chapter 9: EIGRP and OSPF</category>
			<dc:creator>jasonofnati</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6218</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eigrp auto summarization question</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6217&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:50:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I have 5 routers hooked together all running eigrp. Two routers have classful network boundaries,therfore it is showing summary for these networks in...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have 5 routers hooked together all running eigrp. Two routers have classful network boundaries,therfore it is showing summary for these networks in each routing table.  My question is that the eay the book explains it says this wont work, however it is working. I can ping from both routers both ways. Im going to try the no auto-summary command. In theory it shouldnt be working from what i have read. Please help</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=55">Chapter 9: EIGRP and OSPF</category>
			<dc:creator>moyne</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6217</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rip routing problem</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6215&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 03:15:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Can someone please help me to understand about the lap8.2 example of rip in chapter 8 in 7th Edition book? all 3 router A, B and C are configured...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Can someone please help me to understand about the lap8.2 example of rip in chapter 8 in 7th Edition book? all 3 router A, B and C are configured with networks 172.16.10.0, 172.16.20.0, 172.16.30.0, 172.16.40.0, but according to what i know, if use Rip on 3 routers, then they will advertise the same network 172.16.0.0, and i cant ping anything, what should I do? can i use the command &quot;no auto-summary&quot; to solve this problem?<br />
Thanks!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Chapter 8: IP Routing</category>
			<dc:creator>tien1901</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6215</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>From OSPF to BGP</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6214&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 15:11:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello everyone, 
 
I'm trying to figure out a weird routing issue I'm experiencing, I will lay it out for you guys hoping someone could help me sort...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello everyone,<br />
<br />
I'm trying to figure out a weird routing issue I'm experiencing, I will lay it out for you guys hoping someone could help me sort this out.<br />
<br />
At a branch office we have a [Primary Router] &amp; [Backup router] learning some routes via ospf. The problem is on the backup router, while the primary is dynamically learning these routes via ospf, the backup is learning them via bgp through the PE that is facing this bck router.<br />
<br />
[PE]-----------------------------[PE]<br />
|                                              |<br />
|                                              |<br />
|                                              |<br />
[Pri Router]                        [BCK Router]<br />
<br />
The backup router had this routes configured statically before, when they were removed they started to be learnt via ospf now when you perform a clear bgp they started to be learn from its neighbor PE via bgp instead of ospf. We configured them statically and remove them to they start to be learn via ospf now what I'm afraid is that if this backup circuit goes down or someone reboots the router they will go back to be learn via bgp. isn't this weird?<br />
<br />
any advise will be greatly appreciated.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=31">Routing</category>
			<dc:creator>n3twrk0p</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6214</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Chapter 8 Pg 374/375</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6213&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:56:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm using CCNA Virtual Lab to set up Fig 8.10 internetwork. 
 
After adding the static routes 192.168.10.0 and 192.168.20.0 to Router Corp, I have no...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I'm using CCNA Virtual Lab to set up Fig 8.10 internetwork.<br />
<br />
After adding the static routes 192.168.10.0 and 192.168.20.0 to Router Corp, I have no problem pinging to the Finance PC and the Marketing PC from Router Corp. <br />
<br />
What bothers me is when I removed one of the above two routes, for example, when I remove ip route 192.168.20.0 statement from Router Corp, why am I still able to ping to the Marketing PC successfully? <br />
<br />
Show ip route reveals 192.168.10.0/24 is connected via 10.1.2.2 while the other ip route 192.168.20.0/24 via 10.1.3.2 is no longer available which is expected. <br />
<br />
I would appreciate very much if you can help me to understand how does Router Corp know that it is possible to reach 192.168.20.1 (Marketing PC) via 10.1.2.2 when its routing table now only has the ip route to the 192.168.10.0/24 network?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Chapter 8: IP Routing</category>
			<dc:creator>jacklim</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6213</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CCENT Packet Tracer Labs</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6212&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 19:51:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Greetings, 
I'm looking for the CCENT Packet Tracer labs to 
go along with Lammle's CCENT study guide, ed. 2 (just purchased) 
 
 
I have Packet...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Greetings,<br />
I'm looking for the CCENT Packet Tracer labs to<br />
go along with Lammle's CCENT study guide, ed. 2 (just purchased)<br />
<br />
<br />
I have Packet Tracer installed and I'm ready to go.<br />
<br />
Does anyone know where/how I should acquire the labs?<br />
I have searched the forums and have emailed Mr. Lammle.<br />
<br />
Thanks for any constructive feedback.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=91">General Questions (Any Chapter)</category>
			<dc:creator>rmendoza</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6212</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>New family</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6211&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 14:08:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>These just came -  
Now i need a bigger rack (order one of them today). 
 
BE.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>These just came - <br />
Now i need a bigger rack (order one of them today).<br />
<br />
BE.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/attachment.php?attachmentid=510&amp;d=1368021839" target="_blank">20130508_145359.jpg</a> (160.4 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=39">CCNP Equipment</category>
			<dc:creator>Big Evil</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6211</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Looking for CompTIA Network+ Study Guide Chapter Reference</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6210&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:14:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Chapter 1 of the second edition says to come to this site for up-to-the-minute updates on the chapter but I am not seeing anything on the chapter or...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Chapter 1 of the second edition says to come to this site for up-to-the-minute updates on the chapter but I am not seeing anything on the chapter or book, as others are outlined.  Can someone point this rookie first timer in the right direction, please? Thank you.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=66">Network +</category>
			<dc:creator>ladsteele</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6210</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>OSI Model question</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6209&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 21:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I have a question, when thinking about the model, what's the best way to understand it?  Example:  what's the communication thought process...as in...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have a question, when thinking about the model, what's the best way to understand it?  Example:  what's the communication thought process...as in do I think of the stack as a  communication from application layer down to physical wire and then up again on the opposite device after it crosses the wire and gets to its destination ?  I hope this makes sense.  Or is it easier to think of it as one device and go down or up the layers and just commit to memory the processes at each layer and forget how and when it communicates to another device and how that then goes thru the layers again?  Thanks.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=66">Network +</category>
			<dc:creator>justin217</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6209</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Passed CCNA -- 841</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6208&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:52:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I finally made it. It was tough and as  Mr Lammle mentions you have to have 'fortitude' to get through it. 
 
Thankyou everybody for helping me.  
 
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I finally made it. It was tough and as  Mr Lammle mentions you have to have 'fortitude' to get through it.<br />
<br />
Thankyou everybody for helping me. <br />
<br />
<br />
Dan</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=63">Announcements</category>
			<dc:creator>kam2700</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6208</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Address Learning</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6207&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:18:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>This question may be slightly outside the bounds of this chapter but as I was reading I was thinking about this and I am trying to understand...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This question may be slightly outside the bounds of this chapter but as I was reading I was thinking about this and I am trying to understand switching and L2 traffic better so I figured I would throw this out there.<br />
<br />
I have 2 NICs on my machine, one for a wired network and one for a wireless network, and both pull IPs from the same network, so they live on the same VLAN. Of course they have different MAC addresses.<br />
<br />
When connecting with the wired NIC the switch will learn the hosts source MAC and add it to the forward/filter table.<br />
<br />
Let's say I'm trying to SSH, ping, whatever, to another machine on that same wired network. During that ping or session I move from the wired connection to wireless. The wireless NIC will then ARP and the source MAC added to the switch forward/filter table. The switch and the entire layer 2 network should see this as a completely different computer and session right? Meaning that the original wired session would timeout and eventually the wired NICs MAC entry into the switch would time out correct? I'd have to re-initiate the ssh session or ping because there isn't any way the switch would know they are from the same machine, correct?<br />
<br />
I hope this questions makes sense.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=77">Chapter 2: Ethernet and Data Encapsulation</category>
			<dc:creator>dae26</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6207</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>boot system tftp?</title>
			<link>http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6206&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:20:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I was just playing with packet tracer, which would seem to allow a person to boot (or copy into RAM) an IOS image directly from a tftp server at...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I was just playing with packet tracer, which would seem to allow a person to boot (or copy into RAM) an IOS image directly from a tftp server at boot-time.  <br />
<br />
I know PT will allow you to copy an IOS image using 'copy tftp flash'.  That works fine; however, I can't make the above work.  No matter how I phrase it (either using the instructions on page 289) or &quot;(config)&gt; boot system tftp://...&quot;, when I do show run-, I get &quot;boot system flash tftp...&quot;<br />
<br />
So I'm assuming I'm missing something, because it seems the 2620 router (sim) wants to force me to use a flash filename, not a file on the tftp server.<br />
<br />
I read somewhere else (tech republic) that to enable this on a real router, you have to modify the config register.  Well, 0x010F doesn't work, but this article did say the registers on various routers may be slightly different, and to consult your router manual.  <br />
<br />
Well, I have no router at home, unless you count a netgear...I suppose I could browse Cisco's website for an operations manual, but...<br />
<br />
Anybody else messed with this?<br />
<br />
Thanks,<br />
Pete Fox</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.lammle.com/discussion/forumdisplay.php?f=53">Chapter 7: Managing a Cisco Internetwork</category>
			<dc:creator>wanfox</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lammle.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=6206</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
