Official Lammle User Forum
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
hi all
this is my 1st post here please can anyone tell me easy way to understand subnetting vlsm summrization Last edited by khalillaghari; 07-25-2009 at 06:31 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
khalillaghari;5875]hi all
this is my 1st post here please can anyone tell me easy way to understand subnetting vlsm summrization Yes,I can tell u the easy and simple way to memorise subnetting vlsm summerization. 1.Implenment what u read asap. 2.Answer similar questions anywhere u see it.Eg there are thousands of questions about subnetting vlsm summerization. I pray it helps because I am new when it comes to networking. Thanks. Magnus. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Xtopher62705 /hi all
this is my second post here please lammle help me about summrization!! i have problem in summrization i have these networks how can i summrize these n/w into one summry 192.168.10.0/25 host range is 192.168.10.1 to 126 and 127 is brodcats mask is 255.255.255.128 192.168.0.126/26 host range 192.168.10.129 last host is 190 and broadcats is 191 mask is 255.255.255.192 192.168.10.208/28 host range 192.168.10.209 to 192.168.10.222 and broadcast is 223 mask is 255.255.255.240 can anyone tell me how can i summrize these into one summary thanks Khalil |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
These three networks don't really summarize.
Do you mean for the second network to be 192.168.20.128/26? If so, they summarize as 192.168.10.0/24. To summarize these, you have to find the right-most bit in all three network addresses that are identical to one another. Looking at the fourth octet for these three networks, you'd have: 192.168.10.0/25 = 0 192.168.10.128/26 = 10 192.168.10.208/29 = 11010 Because the top address has a 25 bit mask, only the first bit in the last octet can be compared between the three networks. Since they don't match, you have to move to the left one bit, to the 24th bit. This one matches on all three. Since it does, you build your mask to mask away all the bits to the right of it. So the summary address is 192.168.10.0/24. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Be careful when using that method to summarise, as you may also include other subnets in that range that you do not want part of the summarisation. It's best to summarise networks that are contiguous to prevent problems with routing protocols later on. This means designing your network with expansion in mind!
__________________
Comptia: Network+, Server+; Cisco: CCENT, CCNA, CCNP; Microsoft: 70-291 Currently studying: CCNA Security Follow my CCNP progress with study notes on my blog: http://beyondccna.blogspot.co.uk/ |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for mentioning that Fuzz. If you were to:
1. summarize the networks mentioned using this method, and 2. there was another subnet that in any way used the 192.168.10.224/28 network, and 3. the path to that subnet was different than the path to the summarized networks, then you'd have a routing mess on your hands. If you must summarize these networks, DON'T use any or all of 192.168.10.224/28. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
What part of it has you confused?
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
i have little bit confusion in summrization ..
A routter has a summary route to network 192.168.32.0/20 installed in its routing table. What range of networks are summarized by this route ? - 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.32.0/24 - 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.47.0/24 - 192.168.32.0 - 192.168.47.0/24 - 192.168.32.0 - 192.168.48.0/24 - 192.168.32.0 - 192.168.63.0/24 Mask 20. Next boundary is 24. 24-20=4 2^4=16 block size So what is tha answer ? - 192.168.32.0 - 192.168.48.0/24 I do not know because I do not have the whole range of subnets. Please clarify me in detial Thank You |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Of the answers provided, 192.168.32.0 - 192.168.47.0 would be the only correct answer.
All address bits that that fall under the subnet mask (leftmost 20 bits) must remain the same as the summary address for a network address to be a subnet of the summary address. Summary Address and Subnet Mask 11000000 10101000 00100000 00000000 - 192.168.32.0 11111111 11111111 11110000 00000000 - 255.255.240.0 Of all the networks listed in the answers, the following all have different bits in the masked portion: 192.168.0.0 - 19th bit different- This makes answers A & B wrong. 192.168.48.0 - 20th bit different - This makes answer D wrong. 192.168.63.0 - 20th bit different - This makes answer E wrong. C is the only possible answer. 192.168.32.0 - all masked bits identical 192.168.47.0 - all masked bits identical |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
thanks dear but i have other question if u can asnwer
can ya please help me with this one: the question is: Given these subnets: 192.168.10.0 /24 192.168.11.0 /24 192.168.12.0 /24 192.168.13.0 /24 192.168.14.0 /24 192.168.15.0 /24 ... what's the summary address / mask? Now, my answer is 192.168.8.0/21 is that correct? Please let me know |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
192.168.16.0 for this one
summary wud be 192.168.16.0/20 am i correct |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VLSM and Summarization Exercises | jefss1 | Chapter 5: VLSM, Summarization, and Troubleshooting TCP/IP | 5 | 02-12-2012 09:39 AM |
| Route Summarization Help, PLEASE!!! | Muziq | TCP / IP | 3 | 08-25-2011 04:22 PM |
| vlsm ans summarization | mrworldwarrior | Internetworking | 6 | 12-18-2009 01:29 AM |
| issue with VLSM network | Pramod.purohit | Routing | 5 | 12-13-2009 07:02 PM |
| VLSM and summarization | mrworldwarrior | Internetworking | 8 | 11-04-2009 06:14 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.
















Hybrid Mode


Recent Comments