Official Lammle User Forum
|
#1
06-22-2009, 08:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Port Security Config
We have port security set to max 2 on our switches. However we have a phone (7941,7961) and a computer attached to the phone. The port security still does not create a violation with this configuration. Is this a bug or a feature? Can anyone tell me why this is working and should I change the max to 3??
interface FastEthernet0/3 switchport access vlan 29 switchport mode access switchport voice vlan 525 switchport port-security maximum 2 switchport port-security switchport port-security aging time 1 srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 priority-queue out mls qos trust device cisco-phone mls qos trust cos storm-control broadcast level 50.00 storm-control action trap spanning-tree portfast spanning-tree bpduguard enable 
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| port security |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Threaded Mode
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Switch port security query | milanchatterjee | Switching | 6 | 08-24-2010 07:04 AM |
| How to clear port security violations? | TonyZ | Switching | 3 | 01-13-2010 10:57 AM |
| Can't configure port security | TonyZ | Switching | 5 | 01-12-2010 09:38 PM |
| Root Port vs Designated Port | typesh | Switching | 2 | 01-19-2009 06:59 PM |
| port security commands | Jeffro | Switching | 1 | 07-19-2008 11:59 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM.
Recent Comments