Official Lammle User Forum
Question about NAT pool for NAT overload
Is it true that I should set address pool as:
ip nat pool Todd 220.127.116.11 18.104.22.168 netmask 255.255.255.248
to use all 6 (six) IP-addresses in a continuous succession ?
And if I set the pool as:
ip nat pool Todd 22.214.171.124 126.96.36.199 netmask 255.255.255.248
then the second through sixth addresses (110 - 114) would only be used if there was a conflict with a TCP port number, so it is a wastefull configuration.
Is it true?
Thank you in advance.
P.S. The only silly question is a question that was not asked.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Help with NAT overload (PAT)||eduardo||Network Address Translation||0||08-11-2011 01:22 AM|
|Using interface instead of pool for overload nat||mogulsrfun||Network Address Translation||2||11-14-2009 11:23 AM|
|Question on Lab Practice Scenario for Configuring NAT||gauthierda||General Questions (Any Chapter)||0||04-03-2009 01:15 PM|
|NAT Pool netmask question||maru3445||Network Address Translation||2||10-22-2008 01:10 PM|
|help Configure NAT Overload on home lab||lildeezul||Network Address Translation||1||05-16-2008 05:29 AM|