CCNA Video Training Series

Instant Access, Web or Mobile!

Only $99 for 30 days...
Renew at half price!

Buy/Renew

Includes FREE Practice Exams!

Member Login

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Sign Up!

Official Lammle User Forum

Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 10-07-2009, 05:25 AM
Artur Artur is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10
Default Question about NAT pool for NAT overload

Dear all,

Is it true that I should set address pool as:

ip nat pool Todd 192.1.2.109 192.1.2.109 netmask 255.255.255.248

to use all 6 (six) IP-addresses in a continuous succession ?


And if I set the pool as:
ip nat pool Todd 192.1.2.109 192.1.2.114 netmask 255.255.255.248

then the second through sixth addresses (110 - 114) would only be used if there was a conflict with a TCP port number, so it is a wastefull configuration.
Is it true?

Thank you in advance.

P.S. The only silly question is a question that was not asked.

Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question on Lab Practice Scenario for Configuring NAT gauthierda General Questions (Any Chapter) 1 08-27-2013 11:43 AM
Help with NAT overload (PAT) eduardo Network Address Translation 0 08-11-2011 01:22 AM
Using interface instead of pool for overload nat mogulsrfun Network Address Translation 2 11-14-2009 11:23 AM
NAT Pool netmask question maru3445 Network Address Translation 2 10-22-2008 01:10 PM
help Configure NAT Overload on home lab lildeezul Network Address Translation 1 05-16-2008 05:29 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
css.php