Official Lammle User Forum
|
#1
10-07-2009, 05:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Question about NAT pool for NAT overload
Dear all,
Is it true that I should set address pool as: ip nat pool Todd 192.1.2.109 192.1.2.109 netmask 255.255.255.248 to use all 6 (six) IP-addresses in a continuous succession ? And if I set the pool as: ip nat pool Todd 192.1.2.109 192.1.2.114 netmask 255.255.255.248 then the second through sixth addresses (110 - 114) would only be used if there was a conflict with a TCP port number, so it is a wastefull configuration. Is it true? Thank you in advance. P.S. The only silly question is a question that was not asked. 
|
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Threaded Mode
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help with NAT overload (PAT) | eduardo | Network Address Translation | 0 | 08-11-2011 01:22 AM |
| Using interface instead of pool for overload nat | mogulsrfun | Network Address Translation | 2 | 11-14-2009 11:23 AM |
| Question on Lab Practice Scenario for Configuring NAT | gauthierda | General Questions (Any Chapter) | 0 | 04-03-2009 01:15 PM |
| NAT Pool netmask question | maru3445 | Network Address Translation | 2 | 10-22-2008 01:10 PM |
| help Configure NAT Overload on home lab | lildeezul | Network Address Translation | 1 | 05-16-2008 05:29 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 PM.