Official Lammle User Forum
Question on Summary routes...?
A question on Route summarization, this question is one of the Boson examples that was included with the Cisco Press Exam Certification Library, so certainly not a dump as far as I am aware.
The question presented is as follows:
An engineer has implemented manual route summarization of EIGRP in which the one summary route is 172.16.128.0/19. Another engineer needs to install a new VLAN and subnet. The following are some of the subnet numbers being considered by this second engineer for the new subnet. Which one lists a subnet that would not be represented as part of the existing summary route? A. 172.16.144.0/28 B. 172.16.164.160/28 C. 172.16.180.0/28 D. 172.16.152.128/28 E. 172.16.124.0/28
B and C are both definitely outside of this address range, as is E since that would only cover the range 172.16.124.0 - 220.127.116.11.
However, the answer that is provided by Boson for this question is that only B and C are correct....?
I'm assuming that this must be a mistake since I can see no reason why the summary route would include the address range 172.16.124.0 - 18.104.22.168...
Can anyone confirm my thought on this.
Many thanks and regards.
Currently studying for CCNA.
Routers (1841, 1721, 3660, 2522)
Switches (2950G-48, 2950G-24, 2950G-12, 2924-XL)
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|7th Edition, Chapter 1, Review Question 9||bs_kwaj||Chapter 1: Internetworking||4||09-28-2011 08:06 AM|
|VTP Client/ Server Behavior||samat||Switching||9||08-03-2010 06:54 AM|
|Test question question||bobrosa||Routing||16||04-26-2010 02:43 PM|
|Network+ Study Guide errata?||kristini||Exams||49||04-14-2010 03:44 PM|
|Question about PPPoA/PPPoE||Okibi||Chapter 16: WANs||2||08-24-2009 01:35 PM|